S.I.P.

Home | School Info | Staff | Media Center | Mission | Parent Info | Parent Newsletter | School Calendar 
Lunch | mylunchmoney.com | PTA | HomeConnect | BeThere | OAS | SIP | Student RecognitionSupply Lists | MCSD

Part A

Part B

Part C

Part D 

 

 

 

 

Midland Academy

   Janice Miley, Principal

School Improvement (SI) Plan 2009 – 2010

Part A – Narrative Section

Muscogee County School District (MCSD)

Dr. Susan Andrews

Superintendent


 

I.     Purpose.................................................................................................................................... 3

II.    Comprehensive Needs Assessment of the School............................................................... 4-7

III.   Schoolwide Reform Strategies............................................................................................ 8-9

IV.   Instruction by Highly Qualified Teachers............................................................................ 10

V.    High Quality and Ongoing Professional Learning........................................................ 11-12

VI.   Strategies to Increase Parental Involvement........................................................................ 13

VII.  Transition of Students to New Grade Span......................................................................... 14

VIII.  Decisions Regarding the Use of Assessments.................................................................... 15

IX.    Coordination and Integration of Services and Programs.................................................. 16

X.    Effective and Timely Assistance to Students........................................................................ 17

XI.   Disaggregation of Data........................................................................................................ 18

XII.  School Improvement Survey………………………………………………...…………19-21

XIII. Survey Results……………………………………………………………….………...22-29

 

I. Purpose

System Beliefs

·         All students learn when provided high-quality instruction that is engaging and challenging.

·         All students must have a physically and emotionally safe learning environment.

·         All district employees work collaboratively to improve student achievement.

·         All organizational and instructional decisions are data driven.

System Vision

We envision a school district in which:

  • Each student is given multiple opportunities to excel in his/her academic, social,  

      emotional and physical development in a safe, nurturing environment.

§  Well-prepared, responsible, and caring employees are committed to excellence in

      education

§  Parents, community members, staff and students, are full partners in the education of

      children.


System Mission

The Muscogee County School District is committed to providing education experiences that will enable a student to become a lifelong learner, enter the work force with necessary skills and achieve academic and personal potential.

II. Comprehensive Needs Assessment of the School

Process Used for Completing Needs Assessment/School Profile

 

Teachers, paraprofessionals, Local School Council, PTA Council, parents and students were involved in the determination of the school’s needs.  Members of the school faculty and leadership team collect and analyze student achievement data, information describing stakeholder perspectives, and other indicators of school performance on a regular basis and post it in our data room as part of our balance scorecard.  At the conclusion of each quarter, staff members meet in vertical teams to identify strengths and weaknesses in our instructional performance and organization.  Staff suggestions for improvement are noted and become elements that inform the school improvement process.  Monthly Leadership Team members analyze data, brainstorm solutions to problems, look at research, and communicate information to and from horizontal teams.  Stakeholder perspectives are identified and addressed through surveys, parent conferences, PTA meetings, and Local School Council meetings.  Survey summaries are presented to the faculty for analysis and discussion. Goals and objectives are formed based on trends identified by examination of a summary of data collected from the school year.  Strategies to help address organizational weaknesses and achievement of academic goals are identified and placed in the school’s annual improvement plan. These strategies are researched based and aligned to the Georgia School Standards. The plan is presented to the faculty and action steps along with teacher expectations are established. Formative impact checks are scheduled throughout the year.

 

Data collected, analyzed, and disaggregated by stakeholders for the purpose of developing the School Improvement Plan include:

  • CRCT Test Scores
  • Academic and Conduct Grades from the Report Card

·         MAP item analysis

  • Student Attendance Rates

·         Promotion/Retention Rates

  • Student and Community Demographic Data
  • Teacher Qualifications
  • Meaningful Parent Contacts
  • Available Resources – Equipment and Instructional Materials
  • Perceptions of Stakeholders (Use opinion surveys, questionnaires; and/ or interviews.)
  • Staff Development reports
  • Quarterly Strength and Weakness Meetings
  • CSU Partner School feedback
  • MCSD Discipline Test

Analysis of Data.

Strengths:

  • Midland Academy has received the honor of being recognized by the State of Georgia as a Distinguished School.
  • Our school continues to meet and/or exceed the criteria set by the State in test participation, academic performance, and the second indicator (attendance) in meeting Adequate Yearly Progress.  One area fell slightly short of the State AMO this year.   Students with Disabilities scored lower in Mathematics (56.5) when compared to the State AMO (59.5).  There is not a SWD subgroup at this time (26).
  • Attendance rates for students at Midland Academy are well above the Local and State percentages by comparison.
  • Retention rates for students are below the local and state school averages.
  • All certified faculty members are Highly Qualified to teach in their subject area/grade level as required by NCLB, state, and local regulations.
  • The number of gifted endorsed teachers has increased in response to the increase in population of state identified gifted learners.
  • Midland Academy is able to accommodate its special needs students in an inclusion model.
  • Midland Academy is sensitive to migrant and homeless children and does not deny programs and /or services to this population of learners. 
  • Parental communication is achieved by the use of e-mail, websites (MCSD, school, and individual teacher websites), school, PTA, and classroom newsletters, weekly communication through work folders, parent workshops, Connect–Ed, and administrative mail-outs.
  • Midland Academy uses all available resources which include Columbus State University Partner School Network, the after school Instructional Extension Program, Parent Volunteers, Peer Helpers, Peer Tutors, and other community services to enrich student learning and achievement.
  • Student achievement is recognized throughout the year with various teacher and administrative awards. 
  • One segment of common planning time for teachers has been scheduled throughout the week.
  • The new P. E. Program for 3rd-5th Grades has been a great asset to the school program.
  • Midland Academy highlights our math program by sponsoring a regional math tournament each year.
  • Student academic and service teams:  Safety Patrols, Broadcast Team, Student Council, Science Team, Math Team, Peer Helpers

 Academic Needs:

  • The number of Economically Disadvantaged students has doubled as noted by subgroup data and free and reduced lunch numbers.

-Continue to collect academic data on the subgroup and monitor performance.  

  • There has been a significant drop in the percentage of Economically Disadvantaged and Black students meeting and exceeding Math standards in the last three years.

-Look for researched strategies and interventions for both groups.

-Seek professional development opportunities in the area of differentiated instruction to address the needs of our diverse population of learners.

  • CRCT data indicates the Reading for Information domain in third through fifth grade is an area of weakness in Reading performance. 

-Create units of study for the genre of Non-Fiction.  Provide more Non-Fiction materials for 3rd through 5th grade.  Incorporate more graphic organizers and NF grids. Strengthen the Reading / Writing connection in this genre.

  • A school trend in Reading and ELA data indicates the Exceeds category in the CRCT is getting smaller while the Meets category is increasing.

-Target bubble students to increase the exceeds category.  Use small group instruction to accelerate target students.

  • The Exceeds category in Reading on the CRCT was below 35%, the state required percentage.

-Target bubble students to increase the exceeds category.   

  • Reading achievement on the CRCT has dropped ten percentage points in 4th and 5th grades this year.

-Increase time spent on reading for information.  Seek professional development for differentiated instruction techniques. 

  • A survey of faculty indicates a need for more common planning time for collaborating, planning Rubicon Units, and examining student work in order to move deeper into implementation of the GPS. 

-Collect and study alternate schedules and creative ways for developing time for staff to collaborate.  Establish protocols for examining student work.

  • Students with Disabilities are scoring lower in Mathematics (56.5) than the State AMO (59.5).  There is not a SWD subgroup at this time (26).

-Monitor the group and seek help from the Instructional Specialists for intervention.

  • Vertical team meeting data indicates a need for more consistent interventions in discipline and motivation strategies for students.

-Establish and monitor a school wide Behavior Plan.  Seek professional development opportunities for student motivation.  Celebrate positive student behavior.  

  • Students across the school are missing a greater percentage of measurement questions on the CRCT than in any other domain in Math.

-Adopt or create measurement units.  Enlist CSU Math Collaborative for help.

  • A third of 5th grade students are scoring in the Does Not Meet category on the Science and Social Studies CRCT Test. 

-Continue to align classroom instruction with the GPS and state frameworks.

  • In ELA there is a weakness in Sentence Construction / Grammar in the lower grades and Revision and the Writing Process in the upper grades. 

-Apply more convention lessons in the context of real writing pieces.  Collect lessons and materials to teach revision.   

Goals

  • Students in grades 1-5 will increase Reading/ELA and Math achievement by 3% meeting or exceeding the standards on the 2010 CRCT.
  • The number of students, grades 1-5, scoring in the exceeds category in Reading and Math on the CRCT will increase by 10%.
  • All students with special needs will be served in their least restrictive environment and reach high academic standards at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in Reading / ELA and Mathematics.  

 

Georgia Department of Education Identified Goals for Improvement for the Comprehensive LEA Improvement Plan (CLIP)

  • NCLB Performance Goal 1:  By 2013-2014, all students will reach high standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics.

          - Students in grades 1-5 will increase Reading and ELA achievement by 3% meeting or

            exceeding the standards on the 2010 CRCT.

         - Students in grades 1-5 will increase Mathematics achievement by 3% meeting or 

            exceeding the standards on the 2010 CRCT

          -The number of students, grades 1-5, scoring in the exceeds category in Reading and Math

           on the CRCT will increase by 10%.

  • NCLB Performance Goal 2:  All limited English proficient students will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics.
  • NCLB Performance Goal 3:  All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers.
  • NCLB Performance Goal 4:  All students will be educated in learning environments that are safe, drug free, and conducive to learning.
  • NCLB Performance Goal 5:  All students will graduate from high school.
  • IDEA Performance Goal 1:  Improve post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. 
  • IDEA Performance Goal 2:  Improve services for young children (ages 3 – 5) with disabilities.
  • IDEA Performance Goal 3: Improve the provision of a free and appropriate public education to students with disabilities.

      - All students with special needs will be served in their least restrictive environment and  

       reach high academic standards at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in Reading /

       ELA and Mathematics.  

  • IDEA Performance Goal 4:  Improve compliance with state and federal laws and regulations.

III. Schoolwide Reform Strategies

 

Opportunities for All Students to Learn

Midland Academy provides opportunities for all children to meet the state’s proficient and advanced levels of academic achievement by maximizing resources available to the school.  These resources include:

·         Columbus State University Partner School Network

      -Lab students and student teachers provide for more individualized instruction for at risk

       students and enrichment for high achieving students.

·         After School Instructional Extension Program

-At risk students in grades 3, 4, and 5 are provided after school tutoring to increase CRCT achievement in the areas of reading and math.

·         Parent Volunteers

      -Classroom assistance for teachers is provided in a variety of ways including tutoring

       services for small groups or individual students, special project help, displaying student

       work, and providing materials.

·         Peer Tutors

-Fourth and fifth grade students tutor at risk students in content areas directed by the  

 classroom teacher.

·         Other community services

-Partners In Education provide incentives for motivating academic excellence.

-Drama Kids is an after-school program available to students in K-5.

-Summer Reading Program

-Yearly Author visits

 

Scientifically Based Strategies

 Effective actions and instructional strategies will be used to address identified needs, particularly the needs of low-achieving children and those at risk of not meeting proficiency. 

 

·         Kindergarten students will be tested individually or in small groups twice during each 9 week grading period to create an individual instruction plan and to measure progress toward meeting the GPS and GKIDS assessments.

  • Teachers who have students exhibiting difficulty are brought before intervention teams for suggestions about additional instructional strategies.
  • Star test and AR books are used to promote reading in students’ zone of proximal development (ZPD).
  • Flexible grouping for guided reading will be used to address individual student needs.
  • The new writing standards will be used to strengthen student achievement in ELA. 
  • “Five Easy Steps to Balanced Math” will be used to improve student achievement in the Math content area. 
  • The ESOL program will provide extended learning opportunities for second language students in mastering the GPS standards.

·         Safety nets will be established in the forms of in-school tutoring and after school tutoring for at-risk students in grades K-5 with an instructional focus on reading and math.

·         All classroom teachers will have regular communication with their students’ families to inform them of classroom and school-wide events, student progress, and current topics of study.

·         To better serve state identified gifted students, at least one teacher on each grade level will earn an endorsement in gifted education.

  • Teachers will have opportunities for embedded staff development and team collaboration on Early Release Days and common planning days throughout the year.
  • Safety nets will be established in the form of after school tutoring for ELL students in grades K-5 with an instructional focus on English Language acquisition.

·         The LRE Project will continue to be implemented and expanded.

·         Student Support Team procedures will be reviewed and the Pyramid of Interventions will be implemented for determining student placement in the least restrictive environment.

·         The computer lab is used for acceleration and remediation on a bi weekly basis.

·         Individual teachers support learning by providing intervention and remediation during the day or after school for students who continue to exhibit academic problems.

·         MAP (mock CRCT) tests are given three times a year to assess student progress toward meeting the standards.  Results are disaggregated, targets identified, and instruction is adjusted to meet individual and class weaknesses.

·         Individual teachers give formative assessments throughout the year to check for understanding and adjust instruction based on the data.

 

The teachers and administrators of Midland Academy will determine if student needs have been met by:

        Analyzing student work                    Teacher created assessments

        Reading logs                                      MAP results

        Running records                                 Report Cards / Progress Reports

        Star Reading                                      Classroom observations

        Rubrics and Checklists                       Student conferences                      

        Teacher commentary                          Student Portfolios

        CRCT online tests                              End of Unit products      

 

 

The Strategies listed above have been identified as effective classroom practices in the research of Robert Marzano.  In his meta-analysis, he examined numerous effective instructional methods, and rated which strategies were more successful in reaching significant gains in student achievement.  Sources for Research-based practices are:

  • Classroom Instruction That Works by   R. Marzano, D. Pickering, and J. Polack
  • Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement by Walberg
  • The Georgia School Keys
  • Success by Design
  • Zone of Proximal Development / Vygotsky
  • Differentiated Instructional Strategies / Carolyn Chapman, Rita King

 

IV. Instruction by Highly Qualified Teachers

 

In accordance with NCLB, state and local regulations require all teachers to be Highly Qualified in order to be considered for employment. When interviewing candidates for certified teaching positions, Midland Academy will select highly qualified teachers.

 

·         MCSD’s hiring process keeps schools informed on the candidates that have highly qualified status through their data base and Human Resource guideline information. 

·         The leadership actively promotes the school by participating in the county wide recruitment fairs and maintaining high visibility through public relation opportunities.

·         The ongoing partnership the school has with Columbus State University offers an opportunity to meet many pre-service teachers and become involved with their training.  This networking opportunity helps in meeting and observing new teachers in action and possible candidates for hire.  

·         Our faculty and custodial staff are dedicated to keeping our school warm, attractive, and inviting. We strive to create a positive, safe, drug-free environment which is conducive to teaching and learning.  Tours are given to parents, community members, and perspective applicants upon request.

·         The leadership accepts resumes throughout the year and will meet with interested persons as time permits.

V.  High Quality and Ongoing Professional Learning

 

Professional Learning for Staff

 

The school offers a variety of high quality ongoing professional learning for the faculty, staff, community, and parents.  A common planning time is built into the schedule to facilitate weekly teacher collaboration and professional development.  Monthly Faculty meetings and Early Release days are designated as professional learning days also. The administration provides ongoing, job-embedded professional learning through presentations, discussions, articles, presenters, brainstorm sessions, and projects.  Information is redelivered from MCSD by school representatives and the curriculum council liaison regularly.  Faculty and staff are encouraged to participate in School District sponsored opportunities.  Paraprofessionals are offered monthly meetings on a variety of topics.  Parent and community workshops are sponsored through PTA and school staff to support new initiatives such as: curriculum changes, new report cards and strategies for home learning. 

 

Although Midland Academy continues to be a high performing school, attention to declining trends in achievement will help improve the instructional program.  The action steps taken in the 2009-2010 school year are aimed at weaknesses seen through data disaggregation and stakeholder feedback. Maintaining a data room to study and track instructional progress will be of assistance in reaching the school’s full potential.

 

 Mathematics will be the focus in raising test scores in the upcoming year. Developing curriculum maps and Rubicon units will help strengthen understanding of the math standards and support more rigorous classroom instruction. State and county staff development initiatives such as; Standards Based Classrooms, Five Easy Steps to a Balanced Math Program, and Rigor Relevance will support our efforts in this year’s plan.

 

Differentiated instruction will continue to be a focus as gifted learners are cluster grouped and inclusion students are placed in the regular education classroom for co-teaching opportunities.

Professional development will be obtained to help teachers implement strategies required for a diverse population of learners.

 

A Professional Learning Plan for Midland 2009-2010

 

Content Strands

Professional Learning Topics

Delivery

Timeline

Facilitator

 

 

 

 

 

Curriculum

Differentiated Instruction

Faculty Meetings

Grade  Groups

Ongoing

all year

S. Wright

Reading

Guided Reading

Tapes / Handouts

Grade Groups

Feb. & Mar.

Miley

LaFortune

Reading/ Assessment

DRA Testing K-3

Grade Groups

 

Oct. K

Nov. 1st  2nd

LaFortune

Reading/ Science

NF Reading / Units

Grade Groups

Articles

Ongoing

all year

Miley LaFortune

Writing

Writing / Analyzing Student work

Grade Groups

Jan.

LaFortune Whitaker

Curriculum

Portfolios  (Writing & Reading)

Faculty Meetings

Feb.

MCSD person

Miley LaFortune

Curriculum

Thinking MAPS

Grade Groups

Ongoing

All year

MCSD person

Curriculum

Rubicon Units

Early Release Day Study Groups

Ongoing

all year

Rubicon Team

Math

5 Easy Steps to a Balanced Math Program

District Meeting

Grade Groups

Nov. - April

MCSD Instr. Specialist

Grade Chairs

Math

Integrating Math and Literature

 

Faculty Meeting

Dec.

CSU Math Collaborative

Math

Book Walk

-Comprehending Math / Hyde

-Teaching Math / Van Der Walle

Faculty Meetings

Jan. -Ongoing

Slayton

Wade

Tatum

Curriculum

Technology for Teaching Workshops

Early Release Day

 

TBA

Beth Williams

Tony Mitchell

Organization

Behavior / Motivation / Behavior Plan

Faculty Meetings

Articles / CD

Aug. – Mar.

Miley LaFortune

Student Support

Pyramid of Interventions

Faculty Meetings

Grade Groups

Ongoing

All year

Amy Ariabian

Laticia Rich

 

 

Alignment to Standards

 

Professional learning at Midland Academy is aligned to state standards, as well as, the MCSD CLIP initiatives.  Various evaluations are used to identify the strengths of our program and to identify areas needing improvement.  These indicators include data derived from student work, CRCT test scores, formative assessments, classroom observations, and stakeholder surveys.  Vertical team meetings are held quarterly to identify strengths and weaknesses of the instructional program and to ensure that the school is focused on continuous improvement.  

 

Assessment

 

Teachers and administrators use multiple sources of information to guide improvement and address areas of weakness.  Disaggregated student data is used to determine adult learning priorities.  Assessments include, but are not limited to, the CRCT, MAP, GA Writing Assessment, End of Unit assessments, Star, and Report Cards.  Information about student achievement, perception data from stakeholders and implementation rubrics all play a part in assessing the impact of the professional learning offered.    

 

 

 

 

 

VI. Strategies to Increase Parental Involvement

 

Parental Participation

 

Midland Academy provides parents an opportunity to have input into the school improvement plan and the annual review and revision.  Initially data is collected from parents and students through a survey.  The results are used to help highlight areas of weakness or help identify misconceptions of the school program. Assessment results and their interpretation are shared with parents through the Local School Council, the PTA Executive Board, the Data Room, and a PTA Meeting.  Throughout the year, the SIP is made available for review to all parents upon request.

 

Strategies for Building Parent Capacity to Assist in Student Learning

 

Midland Academy encourages parents to join with the school in ensuring student success. The school holds several Parent Night programs throughout the year to involve and educate parents on the various activities and programs offered through the school.    These activities include programs on the CRCT testing and how it affects their children, GPS workshops on how the new curriculum is being implemented, meetings with ELL students and families with presentations given by our ESOL teacher.  Math/Science night is an annual event where students and their parents enjoy an evening doing scientific experiments together along with other learning activities. Computer lab experiences are offered each year to assist parents with accessing online websites for practice activities and taking CRCT practice tests. Information is also provided for parents throughout the year concerning AYP and interpretations of achievement reports, the GaDOE Annual School Report Card, State Writing     Assessments and other pertinent information to aid parents in the knowledge and      understanding of the requirements for mastery of the Georgia Performance Standards.  The home-school notebook is sent home daily to provide another opportunity to communicate about student learning. 

 

 

Parent Compacts

 

Parent–teacher conferences will detail what the school will do to help the student, what the parents can do to help the student, and to make available any additional assistance to the student at the school or in the community.  These compacts will enhance            communication between parents and the school in order to enlist parent support toward goals which are established for individual students.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VII. Transition of Students to New Grade Span

 

Plans for Transition

 Midland Academy assists preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs such as Head Start, Even Start, state endorsed programs, or home to kindergarten by sponsoring tours of our school in the Spring. The pre-k program currently housed at the school is regularly exposed to kindergarten through a variety of events such as special programs, visits to the kindergarten classes, and other joint activities. 

 

The month of March is designated as Pre-K and Kindergarten Round Up in the school district. Parents are asked to come to the school and pre-register their children for the upcoming school year. During that month, our teachers hold an “Open House” for parents and students so they can meet the teachers and learn more about the curriculum in which their children will be involved.

 

Midland Academy ensures that students in the exit grade (5th grade) are meeting or exceeding standards by offering After School Tutoring for at-risk students, use of the OAS system within the school day, and CRCT workshops.

 

The school assists fifth grade students in the successful transition from our elementary school to a middle school setting by posting flyers throughout the school to notify parents about the middle schools’ open houses.  Toward the end of the year, a fifth grade assembly is planned where feeder schools send staff to present information and answer questions about middle school. 

 

During the year, Middle school Special Education teachers in our feeder schools are invited to participate in IEP meetings for the students that will attend their schools the following year.

Their input is key in making these students’ individualized programs fit their new routine and curriculum requirements.   

 

Our guidance counselor also helps with the fifth grade transition to middle school by introducing units prepared for students to help them with middle school readiness in areas of social, emotional, academic, and career success.  A field trip is taken to neighboring middle school in April of each year to tour the building and experience life as a middle schooler.

 

The DARE program sponsored by the Columbus Police Department helps to prepare our fifth grade students for healthy choices and to give them a variety of tools to use in peer pressure situations. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIII. Decisions Regarding the Use of Assessments

 

Teachers collaborate to design assessments aligned to GPS and classroom instruction. Both formal and informal assessments are used to monitor student progress and instructional practices. Teachers meet regularly in grade level meetings to discuss,    develop, and apply effective assessments for their students. Formative assessments are given throughout the year to allow teachers to adjust instruction to meet the needs of students.  Teachers meet three times a year to review data on the MAP tests (mock CRCT).  Information from the results is used to drive instruction. 

 

The MAC Team or School Leadership Team works across grade levels to coordinate efforts to more effectively challenge our teachers to design, apply, and review the assessment processes used so that students achieve their potential.

 

Student Support Team meetings allow the parent(s), teacher(s), counselor, school   psychologist, and administrative designee to develop strategies to provide support to both the student and the teacher(s) with the outcome being improved student performance. Educators are able to work in a collaborative manner to address the individual needs of students who are not meeting success in the present setting with the intent of maximizing a student’s achievement in the regular classroom by adapting curriculum content, methodology, or instructional delivery.             

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IX. Coordination and Integration of Services and Programs

 

Midland Academy receives funds from various State, Federal, and local sources. FTE funds are provided by the state to the local school district which are then dispersed among the schools based on student population and needs. The state funds are supplemented by local funds to support instructional practices and school level programs. Grants are available to the school through Title II, III, IV. These funds are used to purchase materials to support classroom instruction and the Extended Day Tutoring Program. Federal funds received by Midland Academy support the free/reduced lunch program, SWD, ESOL, and gifted students. The school will collaborate with program managers of available funds to prevent duplication of services and efforts.     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X.  Effective and Timely Assistance to Students

 

Midland Academy will insure that students who experience difficulty in mastering standards will be provided with effective, timely assistance.

·         The school will increase the quality and amount of learning time through the Instructional Extension Program.

·         The Student Support Team will meet regularly to support students that are experiencing difficulty with academic performance, social / emotional problems, or classroom behavior issues. 

·         The Pyramid of Interventions help to organize and guide the level of support needed for students. 

·         Grade level teachers collaborate weekly to share practices and offer strategies for at risk students within the grade level.

·         Individual strategies will be incorporated in the classroom; data will be collected and monitored. 

·         Columbus State University Partners, Peer Tutors, and Paraprofessionals assigned in Kindergarten and first grade will give additional assistance to students in the classroom.  

·         New classroom strategies will be incorporated into the classroom to support student learning this year such as:  Differentiated Instruction, DRA formative testing, Guided Reading, Computer learning sites, Thinking Maps, leveled books for the classroom, more exposure to Non-fiction texts.

·         Inclusion teachers and paraprofessionals working in classrooms serve as additional support to all students that need assistance.

·         Classroom guidance sessions are provided to students on a regular ongoing basis.

·         Student support groups and individual counseling is provided to students as needed. 

·         Behavior plans are compiled with the help of the guidance department.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

XI. Disaggregation of Data

 

The State provides collection and disaggregation of student achievement data results on adequate yearly progress assessments and for third, fifth and eighth grade writing assessments.  The state makes efforts to report statistically sound assessment results.  Disaggregated reports are published on the Georgia Department of Education (GADOE) website and released to the news media by the State Superintendent of Education. A link to the GADOE is provided on the MCSD website. The local television, radio stations, Midland Academy’s Local School Council, and newspapers provide the local citizens with detailed information about test results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Below is a copy of this year’s Teacher survey for school improvement.  Another version was created for parents and students to gather their feedback. 

 

Dear Teachers,

 

To help in writing the 2009-2010 School Improvement Plan, please complete the following survey.  Please return the scantron to the envelope in  Lisa Whitaker’s box and highlight your name off the back of the envelope.  We need these back by Wednesday, May 6th.

 

Thank you for your help.

 

Lisa and Mandy

 

For the questions below, please use the following scale:

 

A: never

B: seldom

C: most of the time

D: always

Curriculum

1. How often do you use the GPS to guide instruction?

2. How often does your grade level meet to plan standards-based lessons?

3. How often do administrators come into your room and visit to observe the implementation of the GPS standards?

Assessment

4. Do you use different types of assessment? See list below:

 (quizzes, journals, logs interviews, culminating performance tasks and projects)

5. How often does your grade level work together to design assessments?

6. Do you adjust your instruction based on assessment data?

7. Does your grade level meet to analyze student work?

8. Does this impact instruction?

Instruction

9. Do you communicate learning goals to students?

10. How often do you differentiate instruction? (Key ideas: content, process, product, learning environment)

11. Do you group students by different abilities, learning styles, strengths, and/or interests?

12. Does our school provide additional time and support for students who have difficulty

meeting standards?

13. Do you use technology to support instruction?

14. Do you challenge your students by using individual learning goals?

 

 

 

For the questions below, please use the following scale:

 

A: never

B: seldom

C: most of the time

D: always

 

Planning and Organization

15. How often do you review Midland Academy’s mission statement?

16. How often do you review the school improvement plan?

17. Are instructional resources adequate in our school?

18. Would you describe your school as safe and orderly?

19. Is the school-wide discipline plan effective?

20.  Is academic learning time protected in your school? (key ideas: scheduling,

interruptions, attendance, active student engagement)

Student, Family, and Community Involvement and Support

21. How often do you communicate with parents/guardians about student expectations and progress?

22. Do parents have an opportunity to communicate with you?

Leadership

23. How visible is the school administration in the building and at school events?

24. Discipline issues are handled in an effective and timely manner?

25. Do you feel supported by administration?

26. How effective is the school leadership team?

27. Does the principal seek input into decisions?

School Culture

28. Are the accomplishments of students celebrated in the building?

29. Are the accomplishments of adults celebrated in the building?

30. Does our school reach out to foster a sense of belonging among all individuals?

31. Is an atmosphere of trust to foster risk-taking and change encouraged in this school?

32. Is Midland Academy a school you would send your child to?

Midland Academy
2008-09 Survey Results Powerpoint shared at Faculty Meeting

Students K-1, 2-5, Teachers & Parents

Process of Surveys

n  Surveys were collected from students, parents, and teachers

n  Our stakeholders answered questions about curriculum, assessment, instruction, planning and organization, student, school culture, family and community support, and school leadership.

Curriculum

n  Do Mrs. Miley and Mrs. Lafortune come in your classroom and observe what you are doing?

83.3% of our students k-1 said yes

78% of our students in 2-5 said yes

65% of these students said they talk with them about their work.

n  Teachers said…

                                    4% always

                                    28% most of the time

                                    64% Seldom

                                    4% Never

n  How often does your grade level meet to plan standards-based lessons?

n  Teachers said…

13% always

61% most of the time

20% seldom

6% never

n  Are standards and learning goals communicated to students?

n  88% of students said yes

n  Parents said…

83% always

16% sometimes

1% seldom

n  Teachers said…

54% always

40% most of the time

3% seldom

3% never

Assessment

n  Are you given or do you use more than one type of assessment?

n  87% of students in grades 2nd-5th said yes

n  Teachers said…

76% always

24% most of the time

n  Does your teacher keep a folder of your work?

n  94.4%  of students K-1 said yes

n  79% of students in 2-5 said yes

n  Do you feel that teachers have a systematic approach and use assessment results to adjust instruction on a routine basis?

n  Parents said…

66% always

30% sometimes

3% seldom

1% never

n  Do you adjust instruction based on assessment data?

n  Teachers said…

54% always

44% most of the time

2% seldom

Instruction

n  Do you know what standards you are working on in class?

n  75% of students grades 2-5 said yes

n  Do you work in groups?

91.% of students in k-1 said yes

87% of students in 2-5 said yes

n  TEACHERS said….put students in groups

53% always

35% most of the time

12% seldom

n  Do you challenge your students by using individual learning goals?

n  Teacher Response

25% always

44% most of the time

28% seldom

3% never

n  Is differentiated instruction used in the classroom?

67% of students 2nd-5th grade said yes.

91% of these students said extra time is given to complete work

n  Teachers said…

55% always

45% most of the time

n  How often does your grade level work together to design assessments?

n  Teachers said…

17% always

41% most of the time

21% seldom

21% never

n  Does your grade level meet together to analyze work?

n  Teacher said…

10% always

31% most of the time

42% seldom

17% never

Planning and Organization

n  Is technology used to support instruction?

89% of students said yes

n  Teachers said…

21% always

65% most of the time

14% seldom

n  How often do you review the school improvement plan?

n  Teachers said…

0%-always

15% most of the time

70% seldom

15% never

n  Parents said they are given opportunity to be involved in this process…

70% always

23% sometimes

5% seldom

2% Never

n  Do the students and teachers of the school have knowledge of the mission statement?

n  85% of students in grades 2-5 said yes.

n  Teachers said they review the statement…

4% always

18% most of the time

68% seldom

10% never

School Culture

n  Do you like coming to school?

85%  of  our students said yes

n  Is your school a good place to be?

94.4% of our students said yes

n  Do the students here get along with each other?

79% of students said yes

n  Does your teacher want you to do your best?

Students said…

                                    99% k-1 students said yes

97% students 2-5 said yes

n  Parents said…

                                    62% always

                                    33% sometimes

                                    4% seldom

                                    1% never

n  Are the accomplishments of adults celebrated in the building?

n  Teachers said…

20% always

40% most of the time

30% seldom

10% never

n  Does our school reach out to foster a sense of belonging?

n  Teachers said…

22% always

32% most of the time

36% seldom

10% never

n  Is an atmosphere of trust to foster risk taking and change encouraged in the building?

n  Teachers said…

32% always

32% most of the time

23% seldom

13% never

n  Do you feel the teachers in this school conduct themselves as a team?

n  Parents said…

66% always

27% most of the time

5% seldom

2% never

n  Is Midland Academy a school that you would send your child to?

n  Teachers said…

43% always

32% most of the time

15% seldom

10% never

n  Student, Family, and Community Involvement and Support

n  Do your parents ever come to the school?

78% students k-1 said yes

78% students 2-5 said yes

Does your teacher talk and write notes to your parents?

93% students k-1 said yes

90% students 2-5 said yes

n  Is extra instructional help available when needed?

n  Parents said…

70% always

25% Sometimes

4% Seldom

1% never

n  93% of students in grades 2-5 said yes

n  Teachers said….

4% always

54% most of the time

24% seldom

18% never

Are instructional and extracurricular resources provided in our school?

89% of students grades 2-5 said yes to resources.

81% of students grades 2-5 said yes to extracurricular

n  Teachers said….

10% always

70% most of the time

13% seldom

7% never

n  Is our school a safe place?

n  Parents said…

90% always

8% sometimes

1% seldom

1% never

n  89% of students said yes

n  Teachers said….

32% always

62% most of the time

4% seldom

2% never

n  Are students given an opportunity to interact positively with each other?

n  Parents said…

70% always

22% sometimes

7% seldom

n  Are student accomplishments celebrated in the building?

n  Parents Said:

69% always

26% most of the time

3% seldom     

2% never

n  87% of students said yes

n  Teachers Said…

26% always

59% most of the time

15% seldom

n  Is academic learning time protected in your school?

n  Teachers said…

24% always

69% most of the time

7% seldom

n  How often do you communicate with parents/guardians about student expectations?

n  Parents said…

74% always

20% sometimes

3% seldom

2% never

n  Teachers said…

40% always

50% most of the time

10% seldom

n  Do parents have an opportunity to communicate with you?

n  Teachers said…

                        77% always

                        13% most of the time

Leadership

n  Is the school wide discipline plan effective?

n  Teachers said…

10% always

70% most of the time

13% seldom

7% never

n  How visible is the school administration in the building and at school events?

n  Parents said…

68% always

24% sometimes

6% seldom

2% never

n  Teachers said…

24% always

70% most of the time

6% seldom

n  Are discipline issues handled in an effective and timely manner?

n  Teachers said…

38% always

31% most of the time

28% seldom

3% never

n  Do you feel supported by administration?

n  Teachers said…

                                    25% always

                                    35% most of the time

                                    30% seldom

                                    10% never

n  How effective is the school leadership team?

n  Teachers said…

17% always

52% most of the time

24% seldom

7% never

n  Does the principal seek input into decisions?

n  Parents said...

45% always

43% sometimes

11% Seldom

1% Never

n  Teachers said….

23% always

 42% most of the time

32% seldom

3% never

Elementary School Profile for Continuous Improvement

 

                   Date Completed:  09/02/09

                   System:   Muscogee County School District                     School:  Midland Academy

 

                   Contact:  Janice Miley, Principal                        

 

                   Email:  jmiley@mcsdga.net                                Phone:  706.569.3664

 

 

 

 

Midland Academy

Muscogee County

Grade Range: PK, KK, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             Major School Initiatives:

 

School Year

Initiative or Reform Effort

2006-present

Extended Day Tutoring for At-Risk Students (IEP)

2006-present

Expansion of LRE Project for students with Disabilities

2006-present

Georgia Performance Standards Curriculum and Training

2008-present

New Georgia Writing Standards (K-5)

2008-present

ORFF Training

2008-present

Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships Training

2008-present

5 Easy Steps to a Balanced Math Program

2009-present

Thinking Maps


 

                        Student Demographic Data:

 

Homeless Children and Youth

School Year

Number

Percent of Student Population

2008-2009

3

 

2007-2008

20

4.8%

2006-2007

25

3.3%

 

 

Early Intervention Program (EIP)

School Year

Program Enrollment

Percent of Student Population

2008-2009

0

0%

2007-2008

0

0%

2006-2007

0

0%

 

 

Gifted Education

School Year

Program Enrollment

Percent of Student Population

2008-2009

34

6.4%

2007-2008

27

6.5%

2006-2007

68

9.1%

 

 

 

Mobility* Rate of Students


School Year

Number

Percent of Student Population

% of Transfer within System

% of Transfers Out of System

2008-2009

53

10%

26.4%

73.6%

2007-2008

41

9.9%

24.3%

75.7%

2006-2007

72

8.8%

19%

81%

                                                                                                   

                    Fifth Grade State Writing Assessment

                   

                      

                                                               Total Percent of 5th Graders in each Stage

 

Stages

2008-2009

2007-2008

2006-2007

Does Not Meet Standard

10%

9%  

15%

Meets Standard

58%

 77%

67%

Exceeds Standard

32%

 14%

18%

MEAN Score

234

 225

226

 

 

 

 

                      Faculty/Staff Data:

 

 

Attrition Rate* of Teachers

School Year

Number

Percent of Teacher Population

                 2008-2009

1

2.8%

2007 - 2008

2

6.5%

2006 - 2007

1

2.5%

 

        

 

 

Attrition Rate* of Administrators

School Year

Number

Percent of Teacher Population

2008-2009

0

0%

2007 – 2008

0

0%

2006 – 2007

1

2.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional Learning:

 The professional learning activities in the past two years that were focused on school

  improvement are as follows: 

 

 

Professional Learning Activity

Year(s) Offered

 

Number of Participants

 

 

On-site (school) or

Off-site (Central office,

conference, or other)

 

LRE Disporportionality Training

2007

60

Midland Academy

ESOL Inservice

2007

40

Midland Academy

Best Practice Workshops

2007-present

10

Off-site

Clarity Training

2007-present

4

Off-site

MAP Planning

2007-

present

22

Midland Academy

K-5 New GA Writing Standards  and GPS Training

2008-present

20

Midland Academy

Rigor, Relevance and Relationships

2008

27

Midland Academy

Rubicon Atlas Training

2008

33

Midland Academy

Building Bridges

2008

19

Midland Academy

5 Easy Steps to a Balanced Math Program

2008-09

27

Midland Academy

LRE  / POI Training

2008-09

30

Midland Academy

Technology Training  (NetTrekker, HB Math /MegaMath, Outlook, Lev. Readers, Integrade, Star AR, Science Resources, Network Training)

2008-09

20

Midland Academy

Paraprofessional Training

Discipline / Motivation

2008-09

13

Midland Academy

Renaissance Place Training

2009

10

Midland Academy

Thinking Maps

2009

30

Johnson Elem.

Ron Clark Institute

2009

5

Off-site

 

 

 

 

 


Elementary School Profile Addendum

 

 

Demographic Data:

 

Enrollment

School Year

Total Enrollment

%

Black

%

White

% Hispanic

%

Asian

% American Indian

%

Multi-Racial

%

Male

%

Female

% Migrant

2008-2009

530

24%

47%

8%

0%

8%

8%

52%

44%

0%

2007-2008

415

28%

49%

9%

8%

0%

6%

53%

47%

0%

2006-2007

747

22%

59%

7%

7%

0%

5%

51%

49%

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free and Reduced Lunch

School Year

Number

Percent of Student Population

2008-2009

145

27.3%

2007-2008

49

11.8%

2006-2007

96

13%

 

 

Special Education

School Year

Program Enrollment

Percent of Student Population

2008-2009

46

11.5%

2007-2008

39

9.4%

2006-2007

63

8.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special Education Subgroups

School Year

%

White

%

Black

%

Hispanic

% Other Ethnic Groups

%

Male

%

Female

2008-2009

52%

      30%

8%

8%

72%

28%

2007-2008

56%

26%

10%

8%

69%

31%

2006-2007

63%

17%

9%

11%

73%

27%

 

                     

                                           Demographic Data:

 

English Language Learners

School Year

Total ELL

% of Total Student Population

ESOL program enrollment

% of Total student population

2008-2009

30

5.6%                  

24

4.5%

2007-2008

24

5.8%

24

5.8%

2006-2007

39

5.2%

39

5.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title I

School Year

     No Title I Program

 Targeted Assistance

          Schoolwide

2008-2009

X

 

 

2007-2008

X

 

 

2006-2007

X

 

 

 

            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Retention Rates:  Percents should reflect the number of the retained students compared to the total number

                                 of students in each category/grade.

 

Retention Rates

Retention Rates

Total Number

%

in K

%

in 1st

%

in 2nd

%

in 3rd

%

in 4th

%

in 5th

2008-2009

0

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

2007-2008

6

33%

33%

 0%

 0%

0%

33%

2006-2007

2

50%

0%

0%

50%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Retention Rates by Subgroup

Retention Rates

%

White

%

Black

%

Hispanic

% Other Ethnic Groups

%

Male

%

Female

2008-2009

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

2007-2008

33%

 33%

33%

0%

66%